Ethnic Cleansing: Catholics Are Radical Subversives

On my last blog I made, what sounds to many, as a ludicrous claim that Catholics are undergoing a concerted campaign of ethnic cleansing in North America. http://durstonia.blogspot.com/2011/06/is-coren-blind-to-to-ethnic-cleansing.html

I asked the serious question, "what would ethnic cleansing look like?" Up until several years ago, I would have said it would look like the United states in the mid 1800’s, the Balkans and Rwanda in the 1990’s or 1930’ - 40’s Germany and Ukraine. But those are the climactic ends of Ethnic Cleansing, not the slow build and process of Ethnic Cleansing.

What do I mean by that? What I mean is that in order to have a population act out in such violent and inhumane fashions toward their neighbours and fellow man, they have to alienate and dehumanize them first. They must create fear and suspicion of this population; and in the case of an indigenous or assimilated population, make them appear subversive and foreign.

If a group or Government were to do such a thing, what would they do? How would they go about demonizing an established people? Like in Germany and the rest of the lot, it will happen through legislative and institutional fashion. You make laws that cannot be followed. And if they are broken, you have a "subversive" group that refuses to obey the law of the land. You will perhaps see this more clearly in the article here: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/analysis-how-christian-militants-might-b

It is worth quoting at length,

“Rep. Lee then said, “As we look to be informational, we should include an analysis of how Christian militants or others might bring down the country. We have to look broadly, do we not?”

Dunleavy answered:  “I don’t know that Christian militants have foreign country backing or foreign country financing.”

Lee then said, “I don’t think that’s the issue. The issue is whether or not their intent is to undermine the laws of this nation. And I think it is clear that that is the case. So it’s not -- your distinction is not answering the question.””

What group of Christians could be construed as 1) having foreign backing 2) “militantly” organized and 3) wish to undermine the laws of the land?  I don’t think it takes much thought to see the answer. Catholics are

1) supported in spirit if not by influence by the City state of the Vatican. This is an old American prejudice with pedigree. That is the accusation that “Catholics have no real loyalty to their native land but to their pope in Rome.” If only it were true…

2) “militant” in that we are openly catechized as being the Church Militant and are highly organized to act upon our informed consciences through the hierarchical authority of the Church; that as you recall is headed in Rome. We have highly organized and motivated groups like the Knights of Columbus, Society of St. George, the Catholic Womens League, TFP, and others that actively, publicly and vocally lobby and protest against immoral laws and activities imposed by the State. Clearly these can be construed as “radical organisations” given the dominant Culture of Death.

3) And as Catholics we do wish to undermine laws that allow abortion, Euthanasia, undermine the sacrament of Marriage, subvert the dignity and integrity of the Family and utilize the State to impose ideology rather than good governance upon it’s people. Basically any political action that has it’s source in the Gospel as guarded and guided by the Catholic Church is seditious activity based on this definition.

But what is most chilling is that this is not Jack Chick and his hooky comic strips, this is a Congressional Hearing that forms Government policy. I’m not even going to touch the “Human Rights” Tribunals in Canada that have defined Christians as “as an unthreatened group” when it launched a suit against a punk band that released a song called ‘Kill all Christians’ but crushed (through litigation) a Catholic Priest that published innocuous magazine articles against homosexuality.

Now based on this discussion, how does Archbishop Timothy Dolan’s pious and orthodox statements look as sympathetically reported by Life Site News?  http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/america-or-north-korea-new-york-archbishop-issues-stinging-gay-marriage-reb

Fits the criteria above quite comfortably doesn’t it?