I have finally seen a rational and obvious assessment of the sexualization of Children on public television by Peter Hitchens. It follows a fantasy riddled, post modern, anti male Feminist interpretation of the issue. What is more likely, a father kissing his daughter goodnight is a sexual act that creates the psychological necrosis of Girls wanting to be found sexually desirable and interacted with during their childhood; or the institutional sex "education" and media (film, t.v. music etc.) constantly and incessantly promoting a girls value and power through sexuality alone? I always find it amusing how feminists will one moment say everything is behavioral and due to social pressure, then suddenly when it's an issue of their revolution causing the exploitation of children, children suddenly have the superior moral intellect to understand and decide being sexually exploited isn't "cool" anymore. The response of the mob, there is no other word for a mindless mass of irrational rabble, is reminiscent of the response I get when I challenge Homosexualists based on data. No response to evidence, just boos and hisses because it makes one feel morally superior.Sunday 19 June 2011
Feminist Lunacy on the Sexulization of Children and a Christian Response
I have finally seen a rational and obvious assessment of the sexualization of Children on public television by Peter Hitchens. It follows a fantasy riddled, post modern, anti male Feminist interpretation of the issue. What is more likely, a father kissing his daughter goodnight is a sexual act that creates the psychological necrosis of Girls wanting to be found sexually desirable and interacted with during their childhood; or the institutional sex "education" and media (film, t.v. music etc.) constantly and incessantly promoting a girls value and power through sexuality alone? I always find it amusing how feminists will one moment say everything is behavioral and due to social pressure, then suddenly when it's an issue of their revolution causing the exploitation of children, children suddenly have the superior moral intellect to understand and decide being sexually exploited isn't "cool" anymore. The response of the mob, there is no other word for a mindless mass of irrational rabble, is reminiscent of the response I get when I challenge Homosexualists based on data. No response to evidence, just boos and hisses because it makes one feel morally superior.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree that kissing Daddy goodnight does not sexualize girls. Your motivational poster is ridiculous. Women have remained resilient and strong after a long history of oppression. We have been abused, raped and suppressed and have still lead meaningful lives. Also, crying, opening up and seeking support when things get difficult can actually be seen as a sign of strength and authenticity.
ReplyDeleteOur world needs feminine qualities: cooperation, understanding, compassion, love. OUR WORLD IS STARVING FOR THOSE QUALITIES! How well have we done with men in charge...?
Men have been raped, abused, and suppressed (whatever that means?) and have still lead meaningful lives. I fail to see what that is supposed to contribute to the criticism of this critique of Feminist double talk at the consequences of their ideology sexually exploiting children and poisoning the social interaction innocent people? Cooperation, understanding, and compassion, and love are not "feminine qualities"; they are HUMAN qualities! Or more philosophically, qualities of the "big G" Good which we all participate in. The exclusivist dualistic conception that women have independent qualities that are superior/more productive to men is the toxicity that is being critiqued.
Delete"How well have we done with men in charge...?"; clearly pretty well. Science,technology, education, medicine, philosophy, the development and execution of human rights including: womens rights, international humanitarian aid organizations, workers rights, social welfare/social safety net, Representative government... I could go on. If the argument that women were suppressed and unable to actively impact social development until the rise of feminism, then you have to concede these are all Masculine contributions. It also begs the question, what contributions have "liberated women" made outside these PREEXISTING and successful accomplishments? I don't think the toxic cultural dualism imposed on the sexes, destruction of the family through no fault divorce, lunatic definitions of domestic violence, supported by a male hostile court system, murdering children in the womb, sexualizing children, enabling acceptance of broad sexual perversion via sodomy, promiscuity and artificial birth control, are positive contributions.I'd like to hear how well female dominated societies have fared for the comfort and advancement of all it's components? I believe they're still in preindustrial and barbaric conditions. However, I'd be interested to see your data.